Payment for egg and sperm donation? Don’t do it
Friday, July 31st, 2009(cz) Payment has its place in social policy when trying to incentivise people to behave more sensibly, but is it really necessary and wise in this area?
I like it when I read in the newspapers that someone with the power of choice has taken a career decision which did not involve putting money first. It happened again this morning. John Terry is staying with Chelsea FC despite the blandishments of Manchester City’s chequebook.
More’s the pity, then, that away from the sports pages the chequebook seems to be working its way into another field of public policy: sperm and egg donation for IVF treatment.
Let’s not be too naive here, though it’s a relatively wholesome human failing. The Chelsea and England captain isn’t going to starve as a result of rejecting Mark Hughes’s reported £250,000 a week offer.
Roman Abramovich can still afford a small pay rise, from £135,000 to £150,000. And Terry’s “totally committed to Chelsea” statement did come after weeks of speculation that may have strengthened his hand with the management. No harm in that; he always strikes ignorant me as one of the good guys.
Mind you, all these figures are pretty obscene when you think about it, though top flight investment bankers wouldn’t turn out every Saturday of the season to get their knees muddy for that sort of small change. And hey, their overpaid underperformance is even worse than the Premier League’s.
Now back to those overpriced eggs and sperm. In case you missed it, the Times reports today remarks by Lisa Jardine, who splits her time between being a serious, book-producing academic at Queen Mary, University of London (they turned me down in 1962, but I’ve got over it) and chairing the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. more…
From: »The Guardian« (comment)


